Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Xeon E3-1241 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 2249 days newer than Xeon E3-1241 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 80 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E3-1241 v3 - 193 vs 183 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3 - 24 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€579.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €579.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12583 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • May 11th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |