Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4690S outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4690S is 1124 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690S - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690S
- Performs up to 1% better in Monster Hunter: World than Xeon E3-1240 - 254 vs 251 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 doesn't have integrated graphics
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | Intel Core i5-4690S |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |