Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600X is 4195 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600X - 80 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
- Performs up to 46% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E3-1240 - 134 vs 92 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€208.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €208.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |