Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900HX outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900HX is 4256 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900HX
- Performs up to 9% better in Resident Evil Village than Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 320 vs 293 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Resident Evil Village
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Xeon E3-1240 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Core i9-14900HX
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1240 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Single-Core
664
23.69735902926481%
Multi-Core
2298
13.913780576410753%
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900HX |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel BGA 1964 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 69 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
