Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1240 v2 outperforms Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1240 v2 is 112 days older than Core i5-3330.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2
- Performs up to 4% better in Starfield than Core i5-3330 - 47 vs 45 FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than Intel Core i5-3330 - 69 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €40.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5274 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-3330 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
69 W | TDP | 77 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |