Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 3788 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 69 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 28% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 220 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E3-1240 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Ryzen 9 7900X
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
69 W | TDP | 170 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
