Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 8640U outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 8640U is 4223 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 8640U
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 193 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 28 vs 69 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1240 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Ryzen 5 8640U
Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1240 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Single-Core
664
26.752618855761483%
Multi-Core
2298
26.20595278823127%
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 6th, 2023 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| 69 W | TDP | 28 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 760M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
