Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Xeon E3-1225 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2634 days newer than Xeon E3-1225 v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 19% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Xeon E3-1225 v5 - 152 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 - 32 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €417.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65395 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Single-Core
1217
44.578754578754584%
Multi-Core
3420
19.86178059120739%
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
80 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |