Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms Xeon E3-1225 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1975 days newer than Xeon E3-1225 v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 12% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon E3-1225 v5 - 192 vs 171 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 - 16 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €300.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65398 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Single-Core
1217
56.05711653615846%
Multi-Core
3420
37.29146221786065%
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |