Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Xeon E3-1225 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 2290 days newer than Xeon E3-1225 v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 18% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E3-1225 v5 - 122 vs 103 FPS
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 - 58 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 - 8 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1225 v5
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Core i3-12100F
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 33.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
