Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1220L v2 outperforms Core i7-940 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1220L v2 is 1274 days newer than Core i7-940.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2
- Performs up to 1% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-940 - 91 vs 90 FPS
- Consumes up to 87% less energy than Intel Core i7-940 - 17 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 - 8 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 243 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-940 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |