Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6400 outperforms Xeon E3-1220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6400 is 1551 days newer than Xeon E3-1220.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Performs up to 4% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Xeon E3-1220 - 287 vs 275 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1220 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220 doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
287
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€93.06
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €93.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220 | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |