Buy on Amazon
€202.65
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $203
Availability
MSRP in USD: $203
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10500 outperforms Xeon E3-1220 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10500 is 2524 days newer than Xeon E3-1220 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10500
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield 2042 than Xeon E3-1220 v3 - 164 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-10500
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
164
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€202.65
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-10500 (Basistakt: 3,10GHz; Sockel: LGA1200; 65Watt) Box
Buy for €202.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12201 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1220 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Core i5-10500
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-10500 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Xeon E3-1220 v3 or Core i5-10500
Battlefield 2042, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
46 FPS
€13.8/FPS
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
Core i5-10500
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€634.76
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
