Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1220 v2 outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1220 v2 is 717 days older than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2
- Performs up to 2% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G1840 - 93 vs 91 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 - 53 vs 69 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1220 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 69 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
