Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2388G outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2388G is 658 days newer than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2388G
- Performs up to 21% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Athlon 3000G - 197 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2388G - 35 vs 95 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
163
82.74111675126903%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€80
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57277 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
41.64490861618799%
Multi-Core
1975
19.763834684278994%
Intel Xeon E-2388G | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Xeon E | Collection | Athlon |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics P750 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |