Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2356G outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2356G is 2557 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2356G
- Performs up to 11% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 178 vs 160 FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 80 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Xeon E-2356G
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2356G | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell-E |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 12 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 85 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics P750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
