Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2314 outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2314 is 1532 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2314
- Performs up to 22% better in Dead Island 2 than EPYC 7551P - 164 vs 134 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2314 - 64 vs 4 threads
Dead Island 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E-2314
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2314 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Xeon E | Collection | EPYC |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 32 |
| 4 | Threads | 64 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
