Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 2459 days newer than Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 34% better in Starfield than Core i3-3240T - 59 vs 44 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 35 vs 45 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E-2276M
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2276M | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
|---|---|---|
May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Core i3 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 45 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
