Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Xeon E-2276M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 405 days newer than Xeon E-2276M.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 45 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E-2276M - 125 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 24 vs 12 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.64/FPS
100%
Price, €
€579.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €579.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17985 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2276M | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Xeon E | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |