Buy on Amazon
€59
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $450
Availability
MSRP in USD: $450
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $399
Availability
MSRP in USD: $399
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Ryzen 7 1700X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 818 days newer than Ryzen 7 1700X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 4% better in Overwatch 2 than Ryzen 7 1700X - 351 vs 339 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 1700X - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 16 vs 12 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X Prozessor
Buy for €59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 376 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E-2276M
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Ryzen 7 1700X
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2276M | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700X |
|---|---|---|
May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Xeon E-2276M or Ryzen 7 1700X
Overwatch 2, 1920 x 1080, Epic
1 FPS
€699/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Ryzen 7 1700X
32 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€699
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
