Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Xeon E-2176M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 757 days newer than Xeon E-2176M.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2176M
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 3% better in Diablo IV than Xeon E-2176M - 194 vs 189 FPS
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€91.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €91.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 4th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2176M | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 4th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |