Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2134 outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2134 is 1452 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2134
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i3-4160T - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2134 - 35 vs 71 Watts
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E-2134
Server/Workstation • Jul 12th, 2018
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2134 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Jul 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Core i3 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 71 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
