Key Differences
In short — FX-6300 outperforms Pentium P6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6300 is 758 days newer than Pentium P6100.
Advantages of Intel Pentium P6100
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Performs up to 1% better in Far Cry 3 than Pentium P6100 - 121 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium P6100 - 6 vs 2 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium P6100
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium P6100 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Pentium | Collection | FX |
| Arrandale | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
