Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2650 v3 outperforms Pentium Gold G6405 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2650 v3 is 2381 days older than Pentium Gold G6405.
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 58 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Performs up to 1% better in Rust than Pentium Gold G6405 - 172 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 20 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Pentium Gold G6405
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium Gold G6405 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Pentium Gold | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
