Buy on Amazon
€659.85
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $87
Availability
MSRP in USD: $87
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 3572 days newer than Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 73 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 3300% better in Cities: Skylines II than Pentium G6950 - 34 vs 1 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G6950 - 20 vs 2 threads
Cities: Skylines II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel Core i9-10900X X-Serie Prozessor 10 Kerne mit 3.7 GHz (bis 4,7 GHz mit Turbo Boost 3.0, LGA2066 X299 Series 165W Prozessor (999PNG)
Buy for €659.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77474 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Pentium G6950
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Core i9-10900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G6950
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Single-Core
324
20.558375634517766%
Multi-Core
517
5.517020595454061%
Intel Pentium G6950 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
| Clarkdale | Codename | Cascade Lake |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 2 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
