Key Differences
In short — FX-6100 outperforms Pentium G645T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6100 is 326 days older than Pentium G645T.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Performs up to 1% better in The Last of Us Part I than Pentium G645T - 127 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645T - 6 vs 2 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G645T | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Pentium | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |