Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Pentium G645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 1387 days newer than Pentium G645.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 9% better in Remnant II than Pentium G645 - 85 vs 78 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645 - 8 vs 2 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G645
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G645
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Single-Core
465
42.73897058823529%
Multi-Core
800
20.523345305284764%
Intel Pentium G645 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| Pentium | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
