Buy on Amazon
€10
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $434
Availability
MSRP in USD: $434
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6800K outperforms the cheaper Pentium G645 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G645 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6800K is 1367 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G645.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i7-6800K - €10.0 vs €127.21
- Up to 91% better value when playing Rust than Core i7-6800K - €0.06 vs €0.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 21% better in Rust than Pentium G645 - 187 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645 - 12 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel Pentium G645 Prozessor (2,9GHz, Sockel 1155, 3MB Cache, 65 Watt)
Buy for €10 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18259 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-6800K BX80671I76800K Desktop Prozessor (15 MB Cache, 3,40GHz, LGA 2011-v3, 140W)
Buy for €127.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18259 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Pentium G645
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Core i7-6800K
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G645 | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2012 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
