Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms Pentium G640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 778 days newer than Pentium G640.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Pentium G640 - 116 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Pentium G640 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G640 - 4 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Pentium G640
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G640 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i3 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
