Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4400 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G4400 is 490 days older than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Performs up to 2% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G3930T - 325 vs 320 FPS
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Pentium G4400 - 35 vs 54 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
320
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.54
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4400 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |