Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3420 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3420 is 272 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3420
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 53 vs 55 Watts
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G3420
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
72.94520547945206%
Multi-Core
739
75.33129459734964%
Intel Pentium G3420 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
