Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3258 outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3258 is 946 days older than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Pentium G3258 - 51 vs 53 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Pentium G3258
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
99.18433931484503%
Multi-Core
1043
97.11359404096834%
Intel Pentium G3258 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 53 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
