Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3258 outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3258 is 1848 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Performs up to 17% better in F1 23 than Phenom II X4 925 - 160 vs 137 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 53 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3258 - 4 vs 2 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Pentium G3258
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
52.20228384991843%
Multi-Core
930
86.59217877094973%
Intel Pentium G3258 | vs | AMD Phenom II X4 925 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | May 11th, 2009 |
| Pentium | Collection | Phenom II X4 |
| Haswell | Codename | Deneb |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
