Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2110 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3250.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €22.7 vs €199.5
- Up to 86% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-10320 - €0.25 vs €1.83 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 18% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Pentium G3250 - 109 vs 92 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 8 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
92
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€22.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €22.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
Buy for €199.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3250 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |