Buy on Amazon
€22.7
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1137 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3250.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €22.7 vs €181.05
- Up to 87% better value when playing Forza Horizon 5 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €0.14 vs €1.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 53 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 3% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Pentium G3250 - 169 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 16 vs 2 threads
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Pentium G3250
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
164
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€22.7
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium G3250 CPU verwendet 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 3,2 GHz 3M 53W LGA1150
Buy for €22.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
169
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.07/FPS
13%
Price, €
€181.05
12%
FPS Winner
AMD RYZEN THREADRIPPER 1900X 4.0GH
Buy for €181.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Pentium G3250
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3250 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| Pentium | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
