Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8840HS outperforms Pentium G3220T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8840HS is 3748 days newer than Pentium G3220T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
- Performs up to 26% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Pentium G3220T - 148 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 20% less energy than Intel Pentium G3220T - 28 vs 35 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3220T - 16 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Pentium G3220T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 7 8840HS
Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G3220T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
479
19.34571890145396%
Multi-Core
838
7.928098391674551%
Intel Pentium G3220T | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 6th, 2023 |
| Pentium | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | 28 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
