Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9960X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9960X is 851 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9960X
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 158 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-9960X - 140 vs 165 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i9-9960X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
78.95500725689405%
Multi-Core
3898
39.00340204122473%
Intel Core i9-9960X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 165 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
