Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9940X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9940X is 1783 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9940X
- Performs up to 3% better in Resident Evil Village than Celeron G1820 - 301 vs 292 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 28 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 96% cheaper than Core i9-9940X - €35.49 vs €839.0
- Up to 96% better value when playing Resident Evil Village than Core i9-9940X - €0.12 vs €2.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Core i9-9940X - 53 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Resident Evil Village
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for €839 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
292
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9940X | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
28 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
165 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |