Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9940X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9940X is 435 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9940X
- Performs up to 2% better in Deathloop than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 178 vs 175 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 165 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 28 vs 24 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i9-9940X - €379.64 vs €499.0
- Up to 22% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i9-9940X - €2.17 vs €2.8 per FPS
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
175
98%
Value, €/FPS
€2.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€379.64
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9940X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 12 |
28 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |