Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 2520 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 12% better in DOOM Eternal than Celeron G1610 - 504 vs 449 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 55 vs 127 Watts
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Core i9-9900KS
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
23.93258426966292%
Multi-Core
739
8.597021870637505%
Intel Core i9-9900KS | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 28th, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 127 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
