Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 478 days older than the cheaper Core i7-10700.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-10700 - 193 vs 191 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - €253.99 vs €430.01
- Up to 40% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-9900KF - €1.33 vs €2.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.23/FPS
59%
Price, €
€430.01
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for €430.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
191
98%
Value, €/FPS
€1.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€253.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €253.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KF | vs | Intel Core i7-10700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |