Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 478 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10300.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Rocket League than Core i3-10300 - 731 vs 724 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - €174.0 vs €430.01
- Up to 59% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i9-9900KF - €0.24 vs €0.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
731
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
40%
Price, €
€430.01
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for €430.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
724
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€174
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €174 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KF | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |