Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon W3680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 3139 days newer than Xeon W3680.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 35% better in Dirt 5 than Xeon W3680 - 194 vs 144 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon W3680 - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3680 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€12.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €12.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | Intel Xeon W3680 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Westmere-EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |