Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon E5-2420 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 1874 days newer than Xeon E5-2420 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 34% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E5-2420 v2 - 591 vs 442 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 80 vs 95 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
591
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.02/FPS
100%
Price, €
€12.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €12.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10763 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge EN |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1356 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 80 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |