Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon E5-1680 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 1865 days newer than Xeon E5-1680 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 10% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 124 vs 113 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
124
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€12.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €12.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7800 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |