Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9900K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1538 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 9% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i9-9900K - 195 vs 179 FPS
- Up to 4% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - €561.06 vs €585.0
- Up to 12% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i9-9900K - €2.88 vs €3.27 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900K - 32 vs 16 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €585 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
195
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.88/FPS
100%
Price, €
€561.06
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €561.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |