Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-9900K outperforms the more expensive FX-9370 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-9900K is 1956 days newer than the more expensive FX-9370.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 23% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-9370 - 112 vs 91 FPS
- Up to 94% cheaper than FX-9370 - €12.76 vs €209.97
- Up to 95% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-9370 - €0.11 vs €2.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 95 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9370 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
112
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€12.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €12.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10193 minutes ago
Buy for €209.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10193 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | AMD FX-9370 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 220 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |