Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 621 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 4% better in Overwatch 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 357 vs 344 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900 - 24 vs 16 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
344
96.35854341736695%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€102
100%
Buy for €102 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74565 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
72.8739913097455%
Multi-Core
6976
96.83509161576902%
Intel Core i9-9900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |