Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9880H outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9880H is 2185 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9880H
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-6350 - 186 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 45 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i9-9880H
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2019
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9880H | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Core i9 | Collection | FX |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
