Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 1742 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 13% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron G1610 - 131 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i9-7920X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
| Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 140 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
